lundi 28 février 2011

What Hollywwod has been trying to tell social media and advertising. #usblogs #usguys

It isn’t all Hollywood. It isn’t either all Cannes. Movies have a great deal to tell us about...us. About social media and of course advertising.

They have a great deal to tell us or should have a great deal to tell us ... because as is often the case we’re not listening.

We’re not listening, although the business success, the popular success and the oscar successes are screaming loud enough.

So here are four simple lessons to learn, four simple things that can radically chance the efficiency of what you are doing. A contribution to the 4th weekly blogpost round up #usblogs

We’re only listening to people who are not like us.

A British King with a speech impediment, a paranoiac ballet dancer, a stubborn on the border of freaky web billionaire, a young lady who talks to rabbits and a secret agent exploring dreams. These are the year’s most successful characters, these are people with whom evryone of us, or at least a vast majority identified with, cried for, got goose pimples with. And yet none of these characters have much to do with us... Apparently. They live lives we will never know, some of them we wouldn’t even dream having. (I have no desire whatsoever to become a ballet dancer, let alone a paranoid one).
And yet I keep hearing in meetings that we need people in our advertising that are like the people who will buy the products, that we need community managers that are like the people they will ‘manage’ (if that was ever going to be the case...). But the reality of this we see on our web and on our screens everyday: average people build to be ‘like us’ are people everyone is happy to forget immediately and that fail miserably at doing what they we created to do: make us identify. Reality is that is is far easier to identify with people of extreme character who look nothing like us.

We’re only listening to people who have real issues .

Paranoid, speech impeded, freaky, girlfriendless. This is the key to what makes these unreal characters fel real. Like us they are fighting for life, struggling against themselves and others, like us they have issues that make them human, and so they become people we’re interested in.

The Speech has not been a success in the royal courts or the speech impeded. This would have promised a short career. Suddenly we all felt we were in the shoes of that king, we felt what it was to be called Bertie when people should bow to you. That’s because we have all had our speech impediment. Never at that level, but we know what that fear feels like, we know what it is to fight against...yourself...and in public. We lived it at school when we were kids, we live it at the office.

So you need a character, but he needs to have a fight, a struggle, one that reminds us of something we fear deep down. Same again in advertising, same again in social media. Take Old Spice for example: We’ll never be him, and we’re reminded: does your man look like me: no? But we have a way to fight against insecurity: we can ‘can he smell like me: yes’, can he cook, can he built a kitchen, can he give you the night of your life: all of our everyday fights really.

We pay attention if you’ve paid enough to deserve it.

Nathalie Portman, Colin Frith, Leonardo di Caprio. And yes you would say Jesse Eisenberg a relativelly less known actor. But who is the director behind that risk? No one else that David Fincher.

There will be exceptions of course, but the reality is that major talent is involved in almost everyone of these popular successes, that a lot of attention has gone into the content of the film: producing it, getting the right cast, the right place. Something that few marketing budgets allow for anymore. But it’s not all just thrown in the dustbin: it’s all there to create conversation starters. Stores that are fed well in advance of the film appearing, and each of these support the film, they get behind the launch and its publicity.  

So it’s not just about the money, it’s also about what people who received it do for it, how they get involved, how they relay, how they involve us all in their character.

There is a myth today that the digital world can allow huge successes for no money at all. The reality exactly like in the movies is that yes it can be a great deal cheaper, but hta tthe real successes-everyone of the top 10 from last year took a great deal of investment. In making great content, and in putting it forward.

A story lives.

My final lesson from movies is that a success is a rapid thing. It takes a good story, it takes money, but it dies quickly enough.
Which is why Hollywood has moved from a one time movie producing business to an experience produced: derivated products and sequels are where a lot of money comes from.  A lot of the movies who won last night won’t be ripe for that, but be sure you’ll find derivated products from sites, to DVD’s to Music, to ‘after black swan’ on their next poster. For those of you who would like to decrypt this in more depth, I highly recommend the book: Mainstream

Like in social media, like in advertising, good stories need to be given life: a before a during and an after.
Let’s face it, the lifespam of wha twe do has grown shorter and shorter, with digital natives getting used to millions of new stories everyday, and they grown accustomed to getting their stories where THEY want, so across platforms. Because their life span has gone shorter and shorter.

So isn’t it time we listened a little to what movies have been telling us: find characters who are out of the ordinary, find a cause they’re fighting that we understand in our deepest, and tell these stories in the most extraordinary way.
Seems to me our social media and advertising experience would be so much better...

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

vendredi 18 février 2011

Best of twitter this week

The latest one I discovered and a very interesting one from Greenpeace, buy a piece of their future ship to help them build it. Worth a visit: http://www.anewwarrior.com/

The winner of the Pepsi film competition, fun and inventive:

Fasco’s top 50 innovative companies, some expected and some surprises:
 http://t.co/B7UeUoX

And finally my article on the 21st century reader that you were a lot to give me very kind reviews on:  http://lefreddie.posterous.com/the-21st-century-leader-rebels-with-a-cause-u

And for a laugh another top5: the top videos from the week, courtesy @gregfromparis:  http://bit.ly/dHvuDq

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

jeudi 17 février 2011

The Ultimate proof that mutltiplatforms rules the web

Over the last two days, I have been struck by two campaigns. Both by very different brands but that have in fact ended up having a lot of common. The first one for a product that costs you over 100K€ the other about 2€.

Porsche and Heineken, both took up actions to thank the digital sphere, and both for getting one million likes on facebook.

But before you discover the campaigns in video, here are a few interesting learnings:

First digital and real have officially merged: you get thanked in real life, by a real event for something digital.
Second: Facebook is the new brand paradise. You don’t get thanked for visiting a site, for going to a bar or a dealer, but for liking on FB.
Third: 1 million is the goal. Not 50K not 200K not even 500. 1 Million. Not surprising, 1 million becomes a mass audience.
Fourth: this is the ultimate proof of how the web has moved from one site to a series of multiple entries: you get a banner to take you to a youtube-video featured on a minisite thanking you for liking on FB site or on the FB app on you mobile. And you get the thank in a bar or on a car that you can video or take a shot of to put back on youtube, on FB on your blog on flickr or in your room. A picture you’ll share through twitter obviously...


Proof the world has changed!

The site:
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/facebook/international.aspx

And an example of someone putting their shot on flickr:

And now heineken million hugs:

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

mardi 15 février 2011

You can be Barbara Streisand too with this Fabulous app

You love the Duck Sauce ‘Barbara Streisand’ clip and hit? Well you can have your own now too. Just go to

Www.gobarbra.com type in a name and there you go

Here is mine: http://gobarbra.com/hit/new-77ba09cc45e78ce3e61a7a6db3c662c8

And follow this for my other favourites:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.rankmill.com/widget/widget_js?tid=20108&user=564216431&account=2" ></script>


Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

lundi 14 février 2011

The 21st century leader: Rebels with a cause #usblogs #usguys

Hell I screamed! This week’s  #usguys Monday blog post subject is:

The 21st century leader,
Not a light subject and one to treat with care: after the crisis we just went through it would be easy to dream. For this crisis has shown us that the 20th century leader has been more a a vulture, a financial god that is better at making money than at building for the long term.

Now that this criticism (and it’s easy...) is done, how to look for what 21st century leaders would need to be. To do so let’s first look at the challenges he is going to face:

Speed: if you walk you stand still, so you’ll need to run pretty fast to advance jsut a little
People: recent events in the middle east just prove what we’ve seen on social media for a little while: people are back, and need to be accounted for.
Exposed: from marketing blunders, to private life stories, there is not much that escapes the public eye today
Tomorrow: for the first time ever we’re aware that what we do influences tomorrow, and that resources are scarce.

Mix all of these and you get a world where you need to face people and do something they want to get involved in fast, again and again and again.

So what kind of leader are we going to be in need of. In nutshell, I’ll call them:

  Rebels with causes.
Sorry James, but things have changed...

Rebels first, because leaders are first and foremost about creating the change no one thought, no one dare to think, or no one dared to do. And as such they’ll need to create an environment where people are stimulated constantly to upset. An environment where failure is encouraged. For if you haven’t failed you haven’t tried. But where success is celebrated.
See this great video from JK Rowling talking at harvard graduation for an example:

Rebels again because once something is established is when it needs to be challenged. The web has brought one major change: your product, your service is never finished. On the contrary it demonstrates it’s alive by changing. The google home page changes everyday, the Facebook status updates every few months, the new ipad is rumoured six months after the launch of the first one.

And that’s because the 21st century leader needs to be surrounded by rebels. People who actively look, listen and bring about change. And lucky them, their own public is in that game now: talking openly about products, using web sites while accepting to be tracked (often without knowledge...).

Rebel finally because a rebel talks, inspires, he does so in straight talk with one thing in mind: what in it for people who are listening. Knowing that he can be liquidated or forgotten if that’s not delivered...

Causes.
It’s not that one is not enough it’s just that a company now has so many different publics it naturally has different causes. Think of it as the communities to manage. All with their own selfish needs. Where the 20th century saw the emergence of masses, the 21st has become the massification of egos: what’s in it for me everyone is screaming.

And causes are here to help: they give a focal point for people to regroup around. Because it is unlikely companies hold that role anymore, not when they can dispose of you in a nanosecond. Causes are enemies, and enemies are fun to beat, they are important to beat. Here are the few enemies that will be faced:

Not keeping up: with the speed at which technologies evolve, the leader will not only need to learn they will need to keep up. And ensuring people keep up so that they are good, and so that they are not out of a job quickly has become absolutely key. Radically new behaviours emerge in less than 5 years (Facebook is 6 years old), so this will require constant learning.

Not destroying: reputation can go up in flames at the speed of light, and companies are regularly caught with their pants down for bad behaviour. Best encouragement for ensuring that they do good: respect the environment, social policies.

Not listening: with everyone with a voice, not responding is not acceptable anymore. More importantly, listening gives you what anyone one sane would dream of: constant market research, and a bottomless bucket of ideas. And one thing is for sure: they’ll now need to listen to someone else that the shareholder. Listen to something more than today’s stock price

Not matter’ing: how many companies have managed to survive thinking they could fool people in buying something with no value for a lot more money. With the rise of digital comparison, the explosion of offers, you either matter or you’ll be out.

Not dreaming: Again given the choice of rationally equally good products, people seem to go the the product that have the largest emotional benefit. Products that have greater meaning than on the surface. And interestingly to deliver such products companies need to create an environment that stimulate this. Why is it that the most innovative companies have often the most innovative employment policies, and take creative charging seriously? I could quote Steve Jobs, or Sir Richard Branson or Google and its space, but have a look at this video as a good example as well:


One thing for last. Want to be a rebel, want to do that with causes? Well It’s a life long enterprise. So maybe a little like the Russian fund manager who invested millions in Facebook, the one thing that people who fund start ups will stop being obsessed with is the exit strategy. Because leaders who really matter, often stay in their enterprise. The leader of the 21st century won’t  be playing bonus speed dating.
Hopefully.

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

Proof that online ads too can be interesting and worth a little time

Interactive, fun and not your everyday banner!

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

Online vengence:2 video on getting your own back on bad helplines


The web has its dark side: helplines and phone harassment. So some people decided to get their own back, Two videos to enjoy: the beauty of the first one is that although you won’t understand the language unless you are Belgian, you’ll get the point, this time it was against a mobile operator. I personally would lie to d othis to ‘free’ the internet provider here.

The second is someone who go fed up with direct hone services, you know the ‘you’ve won...’ offers that lock you in spam and spamphoning, or debt over 4 generations.
I have to admit that one is one of my favourites.

SO start the week with a good laugh!:


Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

mardi 8 février 2011

Pourquoi pas notre propre superbowl publicitaire?

Le Superbowl,  le footbowl, le starbowl, Le cequevousvoulez Bowl.

Après le spectacle de dimanche je me demande juste une chose:

Pourquoi pas nous? Imaginez, un rendez vous dans lequel la publicité fait vraiment parler d’elle. En bien, un événement où chaque agence, chaque client rivalise d’imagination pour nous séduire, nous amuser, nous faire frémir, nous faire pleurer.

Un événement où on viralise avant les publicités qu’on a choisi de refuser, de ne pas montrer (Groupon). Un événement où on choisi d’aller ensuite parler de  celle qu’on a préféré en passant le lien à ses amis (vw par exemple avec 12 millions de vues youtube quelques heures après le superbowl).

Un événement où que les marques vont choisir pour faire l’événement, se lancer, redonner du temps à la publicité avec des films de 2mn où on ne s’ennuie pas.

Un événement qui refait aimer la pub, et où les marques offrent un cadeau à leurs fans, un cadeau en forme de spectacle (Coke) un spectacle qui est à la hauteur des films qu’il vont voir sur leur petit écran.

Un événement non pas regardé par les publicitaires et leur famille, mais par le grand public. Déclanchant passions, discussions, où l’emotion reprend le dessus. Parce que finalement l’émotion est le grand absent du moment dans la publicité. Mais que les digital natives les premiers nous en réclament.

Allons un petit effort, pourquoi ne pas créer un evènement qui rassemble les spectateurs, et qui au delà du spectacle leur refasse aimer la publicité.

C’est pourtant possible aux Etats Unis, c’est pourtant possible au pays des informerciaux avec personnages moustachus au corps huilé répétant agressivement de les appeler, au pays du Mac Donalds et des hamburgers.

Je militerai volontiers pour que chaque break publicitaire soit exactement ça, enthousiasmant, passionnant, stimulant... Une soirée télévisée vous ramène ceci dit vite sur terre. Et pourtant les Français nous rappellent à chaque étude à quel point ils ont du mal à le supporter.

Allons redevenons notre public, nous avons besoin de lui plus que lui a besoin de nous...



Et la publicité refusée par Groupon, viralisée avant:

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

lundi 7 février 2011

Are you wearing a shiny white suit? Podium vs network. #usguys #usblogs

Twitter, Podium or Network? Here is the question asked this week end from the team at #usguys. But what is the question really?
As rational human being are we trying to really decide what twitter is for? Posing or networking?
As emotional animals are we opposing two different kinds: the famous striking a pose and the punter blabbing online?

Interestingly Google always has the answer? And what is it: well see these two images, they come in first place for podium and network:


    or             

Well thanks very much, I now have to choose between looking silly in a shiny white suit, or talking  inhuman.
Funny isn’t it because that’s exactly how people who do not know the web describe us “geeks” on social networks: a choice between fake stars wanting to pose, or idiots wasting time with unknown people.

So which are we on Twitter. Well, I’m glad to say that we’re a little of both...

Network because that’s when Twitter is interesting: when you connect with people you don’t know at first, people next door, or on the other side of the world

Podium because in fact you are only interesting to these millions if you are on a podium. Any podium, but twitter, asks you to define what you’re bringing to the party. Some call it personal branding, I prefer personality. And likewise, you only really connect to people who are on a podium themselves. Best at bringing info, best at bringing jokes, best at debating, best at marketing, best at making you feel good, best at nasty, best at whatever you fancy. Doesn’t matter what but that’s what people who are engaged on Twitter, those that have gone above 5 tweets, and 20 followers. They have decided what they’ll be best at.

But all of this has a nuance, and important one. I for one hat the two words used. Network and podium. Network implies you are here to get something out of people, in a business way. That you spend time with people who spend time getting some business or favour out of you. So millions of shiny white suits trying to get business out of each other does make for a scene you want to spend much time with.

Instead I look at it as new relationships with personalities. Relationships because twitter will never work if you’re aggressively trying ot make money out of it. See the twelpforce case below. Social media is not a cash register. It might get you there in the end, but it’s never the starting line. On twitter you get a chance, but it’s up to you to earn the relationship, it’s up to you to define a personality that’s interesting, useful, engaging. Do that and you’ll find thousands ready to do exactly the same.


Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

vendredi 4 février 2011

Be what you preach says this great video to recruit creatives

Ok I know I shouldn’t post this video, but I like the effort, like the way it’s making me want to join. And like the way it does not pretend to be creative, it’s creative point blank.
DO what you preach it says, be what you want from people. So it won it’s place on my blog.

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

The force, the kid, and the most shared video this week,

The most shared video this week is an ad. Who said people didn’t like advertising? Not when they are good, very good... With Close to 300k shares on FB,  this superbowl commercial is great proof. Nice and touching.

Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous

Incredible, simple incredible. Great video case: recover friends lost to girlfriends.

Andes is getting us used to great campaigns, and this year again...
When digital brings magic to the real world, courtesy Michael:


Posted via email from #think: Freddie's posterous